In 2016, the pair requested tons of of medical college students and anatomists whether or not they had any issues about the indisputable fact that the phrase “pudendal” stemmed from “to be ashamed.” Most didn’t. One anatomist added that “it’s fascinating the place it comes from, but it surely’s established terminology now.”
This blasé angle appalled Dr. Moxham. It wasn’t simply the inherent sexism of the time period, he stated: “There is a component of that, there’s no query about it. However it additionally, I feel, is each scientifically and biologically inappropriate.” As a normal rule, anatomical phrases are imagined to be informative and descriptive. “Pudendum” was neither. “That is the solely time period which has an ethical context to it,” he stated.
There are different phrases that mirror antiquated notions about girls. The phrase hymen, which persists in almost all medical textbooks, shares the similar root as Hymen, the Greek god of marriage. Nymphae, a barely older time period for the labia minora, comes from the Latin phrase for bride or stunning younger maiden. Even the phrase vagina, which interprets into sheath, scabbard or shut masking, means that this organ’s major operate is to deal with a penis, which isn’t correct or scientifically impartial.
Dr. Moxham knew that even established phrases could possibly be modified, and thought they need to be, as half of efforts to weed out racial and gender bias in medication. He had simply stepped down as president of the Worldwide Federation of Associations of Anatomists, which was working to launch the latest version of the “Terminologia Anatomica.”
In 2016, Dr. Moxham proposed that the federation’s terminology group — which was, at the time, all male and principally European — take away “pudendum” and associated phrases from its upcoming dictionary. He couldn’t sort out all of sexism inside anatomy, however eradicating this one troublesome phrase appeared like a simple process. “I couldn’t see any downside in any respect,” he stated. “I simply couldn’t have imagined.”
‘That’s simply not going to fly’
The terminology group describes its mission as stewarding a vocabulary that’s “nimble and adaptive in order to stay related in a quickly evolving world of medication, biomedicine and health-related professions.” However in apply, progress is sluggish. The guiding rule “is to be conservative when contemplating modifications to terminology and logical in implementing modifications,” Thomas Gest, an anatomist and the former chair of the terminology group, stated in an e-mail.