In an interview, Robin Hayes, the chief govt of JetBlue, stated that argument was “plain incorrect.” He stated the alliance with American was permitting JetBlue to considerably improve the variety of flights to New York airports. “JetBlue has by no means been in a position so as to add so many new flights in such a brief area of time to New York,” he stated.
Enterprise & Economic system
Some airline analysts stated the state of affairs in New York airports made the alliance needed for JetBlue. As a result of the variety of flights serving the airports is strictly restricted, JetBlue couldn’t merely enter the market and provide new flights. As an alternative, it had to make use of slots that belong to American, one thing made potential by the alliance. On the similar time, the airways stated, they might use larger planes for his or her flights and add new routes, resulting in a bigger provide of seats, and maybe decrease fares.
“If you improve the variety of seats out there, holding demand fixed, you’d anticipate costs to fall,” stated Gary Leff, who writes the journey weblog Viewfromthewing.com.
However the Justice Division grievance says American has an higher hand within the alliance and might use its established place in New York’s airports to reward or punish JetBlue, dampening competitors within the course of.
“JetBlue will probably be beholden to its bigger associate, leading to a wide-ranging diminution in competitors in an business during which competitors is already in critically brief provide,” the Justice Division argues.
When requested if the alliance had already led to decrease fares, Mr. Hayes, the JetBlue chief govt, stated, “It’s clearly early,” however added, “As we announce these routes, you will note fares decrease than they have been earlier than JetBlue got here on.”
The Justice Division has stated it desires to reinvigorate antitrust enforcement, in line with the Biden administration’s extra aggressive posture towards massive mergers.